ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics for differentiating HER2-negative, HER2-low, and HER2-positive breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer stratification increasingly extends beyond conventional TNM staging and binary human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) classification. This shift is driven in part by the therapeutic relevance of HER2-low disease. We investigated whether multiparametric MRI-based radiomics could support pairwise discrimination among HER2-negative, HER2-low, and HER2-positive breast cancers. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 157 patients who underwent breast MRI on two 3.0-T scanners. Radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted, and subtraction T1-weighted images. Seven classifiers were compared after a stratified 8:2 training-test split. Model development, five-fold cross-validation, and model selection were confined to the training set, and the selected logistic regression model was evaluated on the untouched test set. Results: Logistic regression had the highest mean training AUC across the three pairwise tasks (0.778) and was selected as the common final classifier. Test-set AUCs were 0.922 (95% CI, 0.750-1.000) for HER2-negative versus HER2-positive, 0.756 (95% CI, 0.529-0.938) for HER2-low versus HER2-positive, and 0.705 (95% CI, 0.493-0.893) for HER2-negative versus HER2-low classification. Conclusions: Training-set model selection followed by independent test-set evaluation identified the strongest discrimination between HER2-negative and HER2-positive tumors. Performance was less reliable when HER2-low tumors were involved, particularly for HER2-negative versus HER2-low classification. These findings are exploratory and require independent multicenter validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.