ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026
A Machine Learning Model to Predict Complications Following Head and Neck Microvascular Surgery.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Microvascular free tissue transfer is the primary reconstructive method in patients with complex defects of the head and neck. Defect site complications vary; incidence ranges from 15% to 70%. The use of machine learning via mutual information analysis has recently been described in the context of head and neck cancer, but this does not distinguish between causal relationships. The current study explores the first causal machine learning model to predict surgical outcomes in patients undergoing head and neck microvascular reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single institution from 2022 to 2025. A causal machine learning analysis using Peter-Clark algorithmic discovery, external knowledge inputs, and large language models was performed to determine predictors of complications. Results: The dataset included 155 subjects with 116 features. These 116 features were generated from the extracted clinical variables after preprocessing, categorical encoding, numerical transformation, and derivation of model-ready analytic features. Flap failure occurred in 3.2% ( Conclusions: Causal machine learning analysis is a powerful tool that assists in the prediction of outcomes for patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction and can identify potentially modifiable preoperative factors to aid in risk assessment. Level of Evidence: 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.