ArticleTranslational cancer research2026
A novel three-CpG signature for lung adenocarcinoma diagnosis: integrating multi-omics, machine learning, and clinical validation.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The identification of non-invasive biomarkers for early detection is critical to improving patient outcomes. Integrative analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression represents a promising approach for identifying cancer-specific diagnostic markers. This study aimed to identify and validate a LUAD-specific DNA methylation signature for the early detection of LUAD. Methods: An integrated analysis of DNA methylation data from the Illumina HumanMethylation450K array, including 455 tumor samples, 32 normal samples, and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) LUAD cohort was performed. Differential methylation and expression were identified, and LUAD-specific markers were selected by excluding probes altered in 10 other cancer types. All combinations of five candidate cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) sites (excluding single-site combinations) were constructed using four machine learning algorithms, generating 104 models. A stringent two-step filtering strategy required each model to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) >0.8, F1 score >0.8, and coefficient of variation (CV) <0.1 in at least four of the five validation datasets [including TCGA test set and four independent Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) cohorts] and required each CpG combination to be validated by all four algorithms. Candidate methylation markers were experimentally validated by MethyLight quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in 97 paired LUAD and 14 benign lung lesion samples. Results: We identified 6,840 differentially methylated sites (DMSs) and 3,020 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Integration of multi-omics data revealed 132 genes with correlated methylation-expression patterns. After filtering for LUAD specificity, 36 methylation markers were retained. A three-CpG eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model (cg00817598 in Conclusions: A three-CpG methylation signature was identified that may serve as a highly specific and sensitive diagnostic biomarker for LUAD, supported by rigorous model selection, multi-dataset validation, and experimental confirmation. The ability of the signature to distinguish LUAD from other cancer types and benign lesions highlights its strong potential for clinical translation as a non-invasive assay for detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.