Observational studyJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
Longitudinal trends in Gamma Knife radiosurgery utilization across multiple technological generations: A Single-Institution Observational Study.
Observational study in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been a foundational modality for the treatment of intracranial diseases for several decades, with successive platform generations introducing substantial technological advancements. Improvements in source configuration, patient positioning systems, imaging guidance, and immobilization techniques have expanded clinical capabilities. Despite these ongoing innovations, few long-term institutional analyses have evaluated whether GKRS utilization has remained stable, increased, or shifted with changes in disease patterns and retreatment needs over time. PURPOSE: Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has undergone multiple technological evolutions over the past two decades. This study provides a retrospective analysis of longitudinal utilization at a single institution, examining trends in case volume, disease indications, retreatment frequency, and platform era.
methodsA retrospective analysis of Gamma Knife treatments delivered at one institution between 1998 and 2025 was performed. Annual counts of first, repeat, and total GKRS treatments were analyzed using negative binomial regression with a log link and Newey-West standard errors; platform-adjusted models accounted for the sequential relationship between calendar time and platform era. Segmented negative binomial regression of monthly counts evaluated slope changes at platform transitions.
resultsAcross the study period, 6,201 unique patients received 7,267 delivered treatment courses. Median annual treatment volume was 276 procedures (range, 71-362); median age at first treatment was 60 years (IQR, 50-69), and brain metastasis was the primary indication in 2,991 patients (48.2%). Total volume increased in unadjusted modeling (count ratio [CR], 1.03; p < 0.001), and repeat treatments showed the strongest platform-adjusted growth (CR 1.14; p < 0.001). Metastatic disease was the dominant adjusted disease-specific trend (CR 1.08; p = 0.01). Repeat metastatic treatments increased more than overall repeat treatments (CR 1.15; p < 0.001). Segmented regression showed significant growth during the baseline Model B era (annualized CR 1.16; p < 0.001) followed by significant attenuation at the Model C transition (annualized CR 0.90; p = 0.01). The primary segmented model showed no significant incremental slope change at Perfexion or Icon; sensitivity analyses indicated that the estimated Icon-era association was model-dependent.
conclusionsLong-term Gamma Knife utilization demonstrated sustained institutional growth, with the clearest adjusted temporal trends in metastatic disease and repeat treatment. Because calendar time and sequential platform adoption were collinear, these observational findings describe evolving utilization and practice patterns but do not establish that platform changes caused the observed trends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.