ReviewCancer2026
Evolving role of proton therapy in contemporary oncology.
Review in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proton therapy offers a distinct physical advantage over photon radiotherapy through the Bragg peak dose concentration in target with both lower integral dose and finite path length, and sharper penumbra as compared to photons, collectively reducing radiation exposure to surrounding normal tissues and potentially improving the therapeutic ratio. However, this advantage is tempered by uncertainties, including range uncertainty and variable relative biological effectiveness. In this review, the authors summarize contemporary evidence supporting proton therapy across pediatric, central nervous system (CNS), head and neck, thoracic, breast, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and hematologic malignancies, as well as reirradiation. The strength of evidence varies substantially by disease site. Proton therapy is well established in pediatric cancers and selected CNS tumors, where minimizing integral dose and late toxicity is especially important. Randomized trials have demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits in selected settings, including improved disease control and survival with proton craniospinal irradiation for leptomeningeal metastases and reduced toxicity with preserved disease control and survival benefit in oropharyngeal cancer. Conversely, randomized data in localized prostate cancer have not shown improved patient reported outcomes compared with intensity modulated photon therapy. Ongoing phase 3 trials across multiple disease sites are expected to further define the role of protons by clarifying comparative effectiveness, toxicity reduction, and cost-effectiveness relative to advanced photon techniques. Future progress will depend on improved patient selection, robust treatment planning, and emerging technologies including adaptive proton therapy, proton arc therapy, and FLASH radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.