Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42870507›Full record

ReviewCancer2026

Evolving role of proton therapy in contemporary oncology.

Emily S Lebow, Helen A Shih

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emily S LebowDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-0212
Helen A ShihDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1550-9726

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proton therapy offers a distinct physical advantage over photon radiotherapy through the Bragg peak dose concentration in target with both lower integral dose and finite path length, and sharper penumbra as compared to photons, collectively reducing radiation exposure to surrounding normal tissues and potentially improving the therapeutic ratio. However, this advantage is tempered by uncertainties, including range uncertainty and variable relative biological effectiveness. In this review, the authors summarize contemporary evidence supporting proton therapy across pediatric, central nervous system (CNS), head and neck, thoracic, breast, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and hematologic malignancies, as well as reirradiation. The strength of evidence varies substantially by disease site. Proton therapy is well established in pediatric cancers and selected CNS tumors, where minimizing integral dose and late toxicity is especially important. Randomized trials have demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits in selected settings, including improved disease control and survival with proton craniospinal irradiation for leptomeningeal metastases and reduced toxicity with preserved disease control and survival benefit in oropharyngeal cancer. Conversely, randomized data in localized prostate cancer have not shown improved patient reported outcomes compared with intensity modulated photon therapy. Ongoing phase 3 trials across multiple disease sites are expected to further define the role of protons by clarifying comparative effectiveness, toxicity reduction, and cost-effectiveness relative to advanced photon techniques. Future progress will depend on improved patient selection, robust treatment planning, and emerging technologies including adaptive proton therapy, proton arc therapy, and FLASH radiotherapy.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsProton TherapyHumanscomparative effectivenesspatient selectionproton beam therapyproton therapyradiation oncologyrandomized clinical trialstreatment‐related toxicity

Identifiers

PMID42870507
PMCPMC13662491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.