ReviewJournal of nursing management2026
Registered Nurse Workload and Resident Outcomes in Nursing Homes: A Scoping Review of Workforce Sustainability and Nursing Management.
Review in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo map RN workload, staffing indicators, resident outcomes, workforce sustainability and nursing-management context in nursing homes.
backgroundStaffing ratios and hours per resident day (HPRD) quantify staffing but not role complexity, interruptions, supervisory demands, resident acuity, continuity or work environment. EVALUATION: Following JBI guidance and PRISMA-ScR, five databases were searched using an RN-specific strategy and updated on 4 September 2026. Following source-level eligibility reassessment and reconciliation of the updated search, 20 studies meeting the RN-specific resident-outcome criteria formed the primary synthesis. Seven studies that did not meet these criteria but provided relevant workforce or nursing-management evidence were retained as a separately labelled contextual evidence layer and excluded from the primary synthesis and PRISMA included-study count. Primary studies underwent full data charting, whereas contextual studies underwent restricted extraction for interpretive purposes only. KEY ISSUES: Evidence was predominantly observational. Greater RN availability and more favourable work environments were generally associated with better resident outcomes, although findings varied by outcome, timing, staffing configuration and organisational context.
conclusionsRN workload is multidimensional and cannot be reduced to staffing ratios alone. Current evidence does not establish a universal RN staffing threshold or support causal conclusions across nursing-home settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Managers should interpret staffing metrics alongside resident acuity, staffing continuity, workload intensity, skill mix, agency use and work-environment indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.