Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42870319›Full record

ReviewBMC global and public health2026

Best practices for engaging lived experience experts in dialogues about climate change and mental health: lessons learned from a global effort.

Britt Wray, Ans Vercammen, Lian Zeitz, Sacha Wright, Vashti-Eve Burrows, Jeannie Yamazaki, Suhailah Jasmin Ali, Kyle Hill, Jemaima Tiatia-Siau, Kezang Wangmo and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC global and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Britt WrayDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. bwray@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0776-126X
Ans VercammenSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Lian ZeitzCollective Change Lab, Lincoln, MA, USA.
Sacha WrightForce of Nature, London, UK.
Vashti-Eve BurrowsSchool of Clinical Medicine and Research, The University of the West Indies, Nassau, Bahamas.
Jeannie YamazakiDepartment of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.
Suhailah Jasmin AliJubilee Australia Research Centre, Sydney, Australia.
Kyle HillDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jemaima Tiatia-SiauSchool of Māori Studies and Pacific Studies, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Kezang WangmoYouth Ambassador, Connecting Climate Minds, Thimphu, Bhutan.
John Jamir Benzon ArutaDepartment of Psychology, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines.
Gail CoHealth and Global Policy Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Renzo R GuintoPlanetary and Global Health Program, St. Luke's Medical Center College of Medicine-William H. Quasha Memorial, Quezon City, Philippines.
Emma L LawranceDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. emma.lawrance@psych.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Connecting Climate Minds global initiative sought to advance research and action at the intersection of climate change and mental health by centering the voices of people with lived experience.

methodsThrough a series of regional and thematic dialogues, Connecting Climate Minds engaged nearly 1,200 participants across seven global regions, including Indigenous communities, smallholder farmers and fisher peoples, and youth. A Lived Experience Working Group guided the integration of lived experience throughout all project components, from co-designing research agendas to producing multimedia storytelling outputs. This perspective reflects on the methodologies, challenges, and lessons learned from Connecting Climate Minds' lived experience engagement, drawing on two global debriefing workshops and extensive project documentation.

resultsKey principles that emerged include the importance of appropriately resourcing relationship building ("moving at the speed of trust"), reciprocity, cultural sensitivity, ethical storytelling, and the need for researcher training. The perspective also highlights systemic barriers to meaningful engagement, such as rigid funding structures and institutional resistance to, or inappropriate systems for, power-sharing with impacted communities. By documenting both successes and missteps, this perspective offers practical guidance for researchers, funders, and policymakers committed to inclusive, justice-oriented approaches in climate and mental health research. Ultimately, Connecting Climate Minds demonstrates that centering lived experience not only enriches research quality and relevance but also fosters more equitable and transformative outcomes.

Indexed as

Climate changeCommunity engagementCommunity of practiceGlobal agendaJustice-oriented researchLived experienceMental healthRegional agenda

Identifiers

PMID42870319
PMCPMC13660104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.