Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42870313›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2026

Urbanization and migratory status shape nonbreeding space use behaviors in a North American songbird.

Emily J Williams, Alex E Jahn, Hilary A R Mann, Nathan B Alexander, Bryant C Dossman, Calandra Q Stanley, Callie F Gesmundo, Zachary M Pohlen, James A Johnson, Peter P Marra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emily J WilliamsDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA. ejw75@georgetown.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2440-2501
Alex E JahnEnvironmental Resilience Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Hilary A R MannEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
Nathan B AlexanderIllinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL, USA.
Bryant C DossmanDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Calandra Q StanleyDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Callie F GesmundoU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Program, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Zachary M PohlenU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Program, Anchorage, AK, USA.
James A JohnsonU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Program, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Peter P MarraDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding how and why animals use space is core to virtually all aspects of ecology, from influencing individual fitness, to predicting impacts of global change. Yet, most of what we know comes from studies focused on the breeding season, which represents just a fraction of the full annual cycle. Further, most of these studies have been conducted on species considered obligate migrants or residents, which limits our ability to understand the full scope of how species, including facultative migrants or species with high variability in migratory behavior, use space in response to changes in their environment.

methodsWe used high-resolution satellite transmitters from 2020 to 2024 to track adult individuals from multiple populations of American Robins (Turdus migratorius) to quantify patterns of space use behavior and movement during the nonbreeding period. We analyzed endogenous (sex, body size, breeding origin, and migratory status - whether a bird was a migrant or not) along with exogenous factors (local weather, land use) to test competing hypotheses on how life history and the environment shape nonbreeding space use.

resultsAcross 85 individuals, we found that robins displayed large variation in nonbreeding space use behaviors, ranging from strong site fidelity to complete nomadism, and nearly half (~44%) switched behavioral strategies within-season. Migratory status, in combination with the degree of urbanization on the nonbreeding grounds, were the strongest predictors of nonbreeding movement compared with climatic conditions or other endogenous differences such as body size or sex.

conclusionsOur results reveal strong variation in nonbreeding space use among and within individuals of a single species. The variation we documented in American Robins likely typifies the flexibility inherent within species considered facultative migrants who also encompass large ranges-a feature which may be adaptive for keeping pace with highly heterogenous environments across a large geographic distribution. Studying the full annual cycle space use needs of species that exhibit inter- and intra-population variation in migratory behavior may be key to determining which species, populations, or individuals may win or lose out as environments increasingly become more unpredictable in the face of ongoing global change.

Indexed as

Animal movementEnvironmental changeFacultative migrantsGPS transmitterIntraspecific variationSatellite telemetrySedentarism-nomadism continuumWintering period

Identifiers

PMID42870313
PMCPMC13663292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.