Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42870298›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

Evaluating sedation efficacy and perioperative safety of fospropofol disodium versus propofol in elderly patients undergoing elective TURP: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Hongyuan Sui, Tong Wu, Lijuan Gao, Qingying He, Jiaming Fan, Qi Li

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hongyuan Sui *Department of Anaesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Second Affiliated Hospital of JiaXing University, 1518 Huancheng North Road, Nanhu District, Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province, 314001, China.
Tong Wu *Department of Anaesthesiology, The First Hospital of Jiaxing, Affiliated Hospital of JiaXing University, 1882 Zhonghuan South Road, Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province, 314001, China.
Lijuan GaoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Second Affiliated Hospital of JiaXing University, 1518 Huancheng North Road, Nanhu District, Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province, 314001, China.
Qingying HeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Second Affiliated Hospital of JiaXing University, 1518 Huancheng North Road, Nanhu District, Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province, 314001, China.
Jiaming FanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Women and Children's Hospital of Jiaxing University, 2468 East Huancheng Road, Nanhu District, Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province, 314001, China. 254602480@qq.com.
Qi LiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Second Affiliated Hospital of JiaXing University, 1518 Huancheng North Road, Nanhu District, Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province, 314001, China. Liqi77fyx@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFospropofol disodium is the first novel water-soluble propofol prodrug in China. After administration, it is mainly converted to propofol by alkaline phosphatase on the surface of endothelial cells to exert its pharmacological effects. Compared with propofol, fospropofol disodium has the characteristics of longer duration of action, lower incidence of injection pain and adverse events related to the respiratory and circulatory systems, and no adverse reactions related to lipid metabolism. At present, there are few reports on the safety and efficacy of fospropofol disodium in the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fospropofol disodium in routine anesthesia for elective surgery in the elderly, so as to provide new medication guidance for its application in the induction and maintenance stages of general anesthesia in the elderly population.

methodsSeventy elderly patients aged 65-85 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II or III, scheduled for elective transurethral resection of the prostate under general anesthesia, will be enrolled. Patients will be randomly divided into the propofol group (group E) and the fospropofol disodium group (group F) using a random number table, with 35 cases in each group. Anesthesia induction: sufentanil 0.2-0.4 µg/kg and cisatracurium besilate 0.15 mg/kg will be administered intravenously. Group E will receive an intravenous bolus of propofol 1-1.5 mg/kg, while group F will receive an intravenous bolus of fospropofol disodium 10-15 mg/kg, both infused within 60 s. Tracheal intubation will be performed when the patient's Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score decreases to 1 with BIS < 60 sustained for ≥3 min, followed by routine mechanical ventilation. For anesthesia maintenance, group E will receive continuous intravenous infusion of propofol 4-12 mg/(kg·h) and remifentanil 0.2-0.4 µg/(kg·min) via a syringe pump; group F will receive continuous intravenous infusion of fospropofol disodium 10-20 mg/(kg·h) and remifentanil 0.2-0.4 µg/(kg·min) via a syringe pump. During the operation, the infusion rates of maintenance anesthetics will be adjusted according to hemodynamic status to maintain blood pressure and heart rate fluctuations within 20% of the baseline values, and the Bispectral Index (BIS) value will be maintained between 40 and 60. After the operation, patients will be transferred to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Primary outcomes of this study: success rate of sedation and time to onset of sedation. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: (1) perioperative indicators, (2) hemodynamic indices at each time point, (3) adverse reactions. DISCUSSION: Elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) are often complicated with multiple comorbidities, leading to a relatively high anesthetic risk. This trial takes the success rate of sedation and time to onset of sedation as the primary endpoints, to compare the application differences between fospropofol disodium and propofol. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fospropofol disodium in routine anesthesia for elective surgeries in the elderly population.

trial registrationThe study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2500115343) on December 24, 2025 ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=294899 ).

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralAnesthetics, IntravenousHypnotics and SedativesPropofolTransurethral Resection of ProstateAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChinaConsciousnessElective Surgical ProceduresGeriatric AnesthesiaHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsAnesthetics, IntravenousfospropofolHypnotics and SedativesPropofolFospropofol disodiumGeneral anesthesiaPropofolTransurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)

Identifiers

PMID42870298
PMCPMC13660162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.