ReviewThrombosis journal2026
Anticoagulation-associated hemorrhage in atrial fibrillation as a marker of occult malignancy: a narrative review.
Review in Thrombosis journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in adults and significantly increases the risk of stroke. Due to common threats like systemic inflammation and treatment-related cardiotoxicity, individuals with cancer have a noticeably increased chance of developing AF. Managing AF in this population presents dual challenges: reducing thromboembolic risk while minimizing bleeding complications. Traditionally, warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, has been the most widely used anticoagulant. However, the emergence of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which offer equal or superior efficacy compared to warfarin with fewer dietary and drug interactions, has shifted clinical practice. This narrative review explores the complex clinical relationship between AF, anticoagulation, and bleeding as a potential early indicator of occult cancer. An expanding body of evidence from extensive cohort studies and meta-analyses supports this association, showing a significantly increased risk of gastrointestinal, genitourinary, respiratory, and, to a lesser extent, intracranial bleeding in anticoagulated patients that may precede cancer diagnosis. Although bleeding is a recognized difficulty of oral anticoagulation, it may expose occult malignancy, resulting in timely detection of cancer and more favorable outcomes. Perhaps it is time to regard occult gastrointestinal bleeding for what it may be: an early warning sign of malignancy. The increased risk of both thromboembolism and bleeding in cancer patients poses a challenge in clinical practice. Though bleeding has increasingly been recognized as a potential harbinger of occult cancer, uniform guidelines for malignant lesion screening after a hemorrhagic episode remain to be established. It is essential to establish a solid, evidence-based therapeutic protocol to achieve the best possible treatment and results for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.