ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026
The competition and cooperation mechanism of policy goals in China's diagnosis-related group: a quantitative analysis based on the BERTopic and Lotka-Volterra models.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAiming at the practical problems such as upcoding and decomposing hospitalizations emerging in China's Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) reform, existing studies mostly attribute such issues to aspects like behavioral motivations, which fail to explain the root causes of the problems.
methodsThis paper takes policy goals as the research starting point and constructs a three-dimensional analytical framework of "identifying goals-quantifying relationships-explaining mechanisms". Based on 377 DRG policy texts covering the central, provincial and municipal levels from 2009 to 2025, this study employs the BERTopic model to identify the policy goals of three phases in turn, visualizes the evolutionary characteristics of the goals through Jaccard similarity analysis, and introduces the Lotka-Volterra model to quantify the competitive and cooperative coefficients among the six major policy goals in the national promotion phase, further classifying their relationships into three types: cooperation, predation and competition.
resultsThe study finds that the policy goal system of China's DRG reform presents an evolutionary law from fragmented advancement to systematic improvement, with healthcare insurance fund management and controlling healthcare fees as the core thread running through all three phases. The six major policy goals in the national promotion phase are improving primary healthcare levels (G1), standardizing diagnosis and treatment behaviors (G2), controlling healthcare fees (G3), raising the use efficiency of fund (G4), enhancing service quality (G5), and reflecting the technical value of healthcare personnel (G6), among which there exist 6 groups of cooperative relationships, 5 groups of predatory relationships and 4 groups of competitive relationships. Specifically, G5 and G6 exhibit a prominent synergistic effect, while G5 is subject to the triple squeeze from G2, G3 and G4, and G1 is in a competitive relationship with G2, G3 and G4 respectively.
conclusionsFrom the perspective of policy design, this study reveals that the structural contradictions among DRG policy goals may induce healthcare institutions and healthcare personnel to adopt strategic behaviors under the pressure of multiple goals. This research provides a theoretical basis for optimizing DRG policy design and promoting goal coordination, and also offers reference significance for DRG reforms worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.