Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42870268›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Technical efficiency of public health facilities in Punjab, Pakistan: application of a two-stage data envelopment analysis.

Ain Ul Momina, Taimoor Ahmad, Rubeena Zakar, Sara Shahzad, Fayaz Ahmad, Salman Mahmood, Florian Fischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ain Ul MominaKing Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Taimoor AhmadPalladium Group, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Rubeena ZakarDepartment of Public Health, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Sara ShahzadDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Fayaz AhmadPalladium Group, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Salman MahmoodPalladium Group, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Florian FischerInstitute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. florian.fischer1@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4388-1245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study analyses the technical efficiency of public health facilities in Punjab, Pakistan, using a two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. The study focuses on family planning service delivery, addressing suboptimal contraceptive prevalence, and service utilization.

methodsData were collected from 100 public health facilities managed by the Primary and Secondary Health Department, with 50 from the Delivering Accelerated Family Planning in Pakistan (DAFPAK) project and 50 non-cohort facilities. DEA was used to assess technical efficiency, considering inputs such as contraceptive stock, staff availability, and facility size. In addition, we used the Simar-Wilson regression to analyse the influence of environmental factors.

resultsThe average efficiency score was 78%, with variations across facility types. Basic Health Units and Rural Health Centers showed significant resource optimization gaps. A negative association was observed between the number of other healthcare providers in the catchment area and facility efficiency, indicating the importance of aligning service provision with local demand.

conclusionDEA effectively identifies inefficiencies and informs resource optimization in public health facilities in Punjab. The findings offer valuable insights for improving family planning services and healthcare delivery in resource-constrained settings.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalFamily Planning ServicesHumansPakistanPublic Health InfrastructureData envelopment analysisFamily planning servicesPublic healthTechnical efficiency

Identifiers

PMID42870268
PMCPMC13663190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.