ArticleBMC public health2026
Parents' perspectives and roles in influencing 10-12-year-old children's fruit and vegetable consumption: a qualitative study in Sweden.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParents play a central role in shaping children's health behaviours and dietary habits. Previous research has provided insight into parents' feeding practices, especially regarding preschoolers. Less is known about how parents of 10-12-year-old children, whose fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake is particularly low relative to recommendations, perceive F&V and translate their intentions regarding F&V into everyday practices. This study explored parents' perspectives on F&V, their reasons for serving them, and their experiences of influencing their children's intake.
methodsFifteen parents of 10-12-year-old children (12 mothers, three fathers) were purposively recruited from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds in southern Sweden and participated in individual interviews. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
resultsParents perceived F&V as beneficial, primarily due to vitamin content and immediate health effects. However, most were unfamiliar with recommendations and often considered relatively small amounts sufficient. Vegetables were primarily served at dinner, with less attention to other eating occasions, which may reduce opportunities to meet the recommended daily intake. Parents described a range of strategies to influence their children's consumption, including mixing F&V into other foods, accommodating preferences, encouragement, and providing rules or benchmarks (e.g. 'Always two colours on the plate'). Some parents expressed concerns about sugar content, occasionally leading to unnecessary restriction of F&V. The analysis generated five themes regarding parents' knowledge and beliefs, sources of information, preferences and resources, agency, and intentions. In addition, four parental roles were conceptualised to illustrate patterns in the intentions and strategies the parents used when influencing their 10-12-year-old children's F&V consumption-The Enforcer, The Accommodator, The Teacher, and The Role Model-ranging from direct influence on consumption to more indirect and future-oriented approaches.
conclusionsThe findings suggest potential mismatches between the participants' perceptions of F&V, including their understanding of amounts, health benefits, and some facilitating feeding practices, and public health messages such as recommendations. More accessible guidance on why, but also on how, how much, and how often to serve F&V may support parents similar to the participants in the present study in promoting their children's consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.