Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42870249›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

How Swedish healthcare workers managed the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic: sensemaking across organisational, interpersonal and individual levels.

Helena Månsson Sandberg, Mats Jong, Miek C Jong, Erika Wall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Helena Månsson SandbergDepartment of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund/Sundsvall, Sweden. helena.manssonsandberg@miun.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6381-586X
Mats JongDepartment of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund/Sundsvall, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3907-2197
Miek C JongDepartment of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund/Sundsvall, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8523-9632
Erika WallDepartment of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund/Sundsvall, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1984-8063

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn times of crisis the need to make sense of the situation becomes particularly evident. The perspective of sensemaking captures how individuals seek to clarify and understand what is going on when they encounter ambiguous, unexpected or confusing events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Sensemaking may occur at different but mutually interrelated organisational, interpersonal and individual levels. During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) faced multifaceted challenges related to their work. This study aimed to explore how HCWs managed their daily work during the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic through the perspective of sensemaking across organisational, interpersonal and individual levels.

methodThe data was collected through individual interviews with 18 nurses and physicians between March and May 2020, and analysed using a reflexive thematic analysis.

findingsThe analysis revealed an overarching pattern of sensemaking as a way of holding clinical practice together throughout uncertainty. At an organisational level, sensemaking included how organisational structures contributed to stability in the organisation of work. The interpersonal level captured how understanding of uncertain circumstances was grounded in a collective understanding wherein HCWs reflected together and in relation to others. The individual level of sensemaking captured HCWs´ capability and commitment to continuing to provide care, despite uncertain circumstances. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The findings imply that sensemaking at organisational, interpersonal and individual levels is an important consideration for healthcare organisations when facing future crisis or other uncertain events. Clear organizational directives are important for fostering a shared understanding of how uncertain situations should be interpreted and managed in practice. Furthermore, HCWs need opportunities and time for interaction with colleagues, enabling them to collectively construct meaning and maintain a sense of stability when managing uncertainty. It is also important to acknowledge HCWs´ individual knowledge, experiences and capability to sustain clinical practice despite conditions of uncertainty.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19Health PersonnelAdultFemaleFrontline WorkersHumansInterviews as TopicMalePandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2SwedenUncertaintyCOVID-19CrisisDoctorsHealthcare workersNursesPandemicPhysiciansSensemakingWork situation

Identifiers

PMID42870249
PMCPMC13660175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.