ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Living with and caring for somatic symptom disorders: a qualitative interview-study with patients and GPs using a deductive-inductive content analytic approach.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPersistent physical symptoms are common in general practice and often occur as part of a somatic symptom disorder. Patients suffering from somatic symptom disorders and their general practitioners (GPs) often experience barriers to mutual trust and effective care. Frequently, studies using a one-sided perspective bear mutual accusation about shortcomings of the respective other side. This study examines corresponding perspectives of patients with somatic symptom disorders and their treating GPs to capture their views on individual patient histories and thereby identify barriers to and potentially helpful aspects of communication, detection, care for and live with somatic symptom disorders.
methodsQualitative face-to-face interviews were conducted with dyads of patients with somatic symptom disorders and their treating GPs. The interviews focused on the patients' medical history as well as barriers and facilitators of management and care in general practice. Patients and their respective GPs were interviewed separately using a semi-structured interview guide. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed using the qualitative content analysis approach described by Mayring.
resultsWe interviewed 15 patient-GP dyads (i.e., 30 interviews). The interviews yielded three general aspects of living with and caring for somatic symptom disorders from the complementing perspectives of patients and their treating GPs: (1) The (undisclosed) patient side (partly invisible to the GP), (2) the shared part of the consultation in general practice, and (3) GPs' management and care. Patients and GPs alike talked about consultations focusing mainly on communicational and relational aspects. Patients painted a picture of living with somatic symptom disorders, giving details about the relevance of personal situation, relationships, and their work situation for their symptoms and illness management. GPs' focus lay on coordinating functions, and treatment and management strategies for patients with somatic symptom disorders.
conclusionTo establish a trusting relationship between patient and general practitioner, removal of time constraints for consultations and preoccupations for symptom management should allow for better insights of the general practitioners in patients' lives. If we allow for time to let the patient-doctor relationship grow, mutual trust may ensue. GERMAN CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTER: ID: DRKS00011380, registration date: 1st December 2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.