Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42870229›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2026

Predicting difficult laryngoscopy via three-dimensional graphical modeling and hybrid artificial intelligence using standard facial photographs in elective surgery patients.

Bahar Uslu Bayhan, Ilkay Sibel Kervancı, Tuğçe Gazioğlu Kişi, Burak Cemil Balık, Medine Atmaca, Kazim Ersin Altinsoy

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bahar Uslu BayhanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Gaziantep City Hospital, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3052-2604
Ilkay Sibel KervancıDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Türkiye. skervanci@gantep.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5547-1860
Tuğçe Gazioğlu KişiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Gaziantep City Hospital, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2336-1848
Burak Cemil BalıkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Gaziantep City Hospital, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0027-350X
Medine AtmacaDepartment of Mathematics, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0902-8717
Kazim Ersin AltinsoyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep Islam Science and Technology University, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5707-7645

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnexpected difficult laryngoscopy remains one of the leading causes of life-threatening complications in anesthetic practice. Conventional airway assessment tests (e.g., Mallampati classification, thyromental distance) are inherently subjective and demonstrate limited diagnostic accuracy. We aimed to develop a hybrid artificial intelligence model that extracts three-dimensional geometric ratios from standardized facial photographs using deep learning and graph-based modeling to predict difficult laryngoscopy.

methodsIn this prospective observational study, consecutive patients scheduled for elective surgery were enrolled. Preoperatively, standardized facial photographs were obtained from eight projection angles. Instead of raw pixel-based image analysis, the images were transformed into three-dimensional anatomical graph structures following local illumination normalization using Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), combined with MediaPipe Face Mesh (468 landmark points) and Pose Estimation (33 skeletal key points). Clinically relevant anatomical indices, including Retrognathia, Overjet, Neck Bulk, and Airway Visibility, were mathematically derived from these coordinates and combined with routinely collected clinical and anthropometric variables as structured model inputs. Cormack-Lehane (CL) grading was used as the reference standard (Grades I-II: non-difficult laryngoscopy; Grades III-IV: difficult laryngoscopy). The structured dataset was used to train XGBoost, Random Forest, and Tabular Transformer models incorporating multi-head attention. To prevent data leakage, Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) augmentation and scaling were applied exclusively to the training set.

resultsPreoperative images and anatomical ratios of 198 patients were analyzed. Among the derived indices, the Mouth Opening Ratio and Oropharyngeal Visibility Index showed the highest landmark acquisition success, with extraction in 193 of 198 patients (97.5%). The proposed hybrid artificial intelligence (AI) model achieved a test-set accuracy of 80.0%, sensitivity (recall) of 85.7%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.808 for difficult laryngoscopy prediction.

conclusionsUnlike conventional convolutional neural networks (CNNs) relying on raw pixel processing, the proposed model combines standardized pixel-space measurements and normalized geometric ratios. This landmark-based representation may reduce sensitivity to some acquisition-related variability under standardized imaging conditions. These findings support the feasibility of a landmark-based, geometry-driven approach for objective preoperative airway risk assessment. However, external validation and direct comparison with standardized bedside airway assessment are required before routine clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceElective Surgical ProceduresFaceImaging, Three-DimensionalLaryngoscopyPhotographyAdultAgedDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnesthetic Patient Safetydifficult laryngoscopyExplainable Artificial IntelligenceGeometric Deep LearningHybrid Ensemble LearningPreoperative Airway Management

Identifiers

PMID42870229
PMCPMC13660001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.