ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Nipple or skin-sparing mastectomy flap: can preoperative breast-MRI predict post-operative complications?
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the role of skin flap thickness (SFT), measured by preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in predicting postoperative complications after nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy, and to assess its value in guiding reconstructive strategy selection.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective single-center study including patients who underwent preoperative breast MRI and nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer or BRCA1/2 mutations between January 2019 and August 2025. Demographic, clinical, and perioperative data were collected. Patients were stratified into two groups based on mean preoperative SFT: >8 mm (Group A) and <8 mm (Group B). Postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed using univariate and multivariate models.
resultsSixty patients (mean age 47.5 ± 9.1 years) and 80 breasts (40 unilateral, 20 bilateral procedures) were included. Group A comprised 54 breasts (67.5%), while Group B included 26 (32.5%). Postoperative hospital stays and incision type differed significantly between groups (p < 0.05). Overall postoperative morbidity was 16.25%. Partial nipple-areola complex necrosis (11.5%) and hematoma (7.7%) occurred significantly more often in Group B compared to Group A (both p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed preoperative SFT <8 mm as an independent predictor of these complications (odds ratio 13.40, p = 0.012).
conclusionPreoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of skin flap thickness reliably identifies patients at increased risk of postoperative complications. Integrating this parameter into surgical planning may support personalized reconstructive decision-making and improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42870219What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.