ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Defining Mental Disorder: Differences in Primary Care Providers' and Psychiatrists' Conceptions of Illness.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncreasingly primary care providers (PCPs) play a role in recognizing and diagnosing mental disorders. However, how PCPs conceptualize mental disorders within their patient population and how this conceptualization differs and aligns with a more psychiatric approach to mental disorder remains largely unknown.
objectiveTo determine 1) how PCPs and psychiatrists describe their patients with suspected mental health conditions; 2) how PCPs and psychiatrists describe easy to treat and diagnose and challenging to treat and diagnose patients; and 3) how PCPs manage referrals to psychiatry.
designOnline qualitative interviews.
participants41 PCPs and 41 psychiatrists. Participants were recruited from two health networks with different catchment areas: Cambridge Health Alliance is on the East coast and primarily serves urban and suburban patients. University of Washington is on the West coast and serves urban, suburban and rural patients. APPROACH: The team performed a deductive analysis of the interview notes using a rapid framework analysis approach. KEY
resultsPCPs and psychiatrists describe easy to treat and diagnose patients in similar ways. However, PCPs see complex psychiatric conditions like schizophrenia as more challenging. Those who felt more comfortable managing these complex patients had patients with access to psychiatric services or had access to e-consult services.
conclusionExamining the differences between PCPs and psychiatrists' conceptualization of patients with mental health disorders highlights gaps in mental health care, including the need for PCPs and psychiatrists to collaborate. Collaborations like psychiatric e-consult services could help improve mental health care access, especially in rural areas, for more complex patients whose PCPs may need assistance with diagnosis or treatment management.
Identifiers
42870178What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.