ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Self-Reported Obesity Medicine Competence, Knowledge, and Attitudes Among US Medical Students: An Eight-School Pre- vs. Post-Intervention Study.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity contributes to many chronic diseases that internists manage. Even though there is a documented gap in obesity education, no studies have evaluated competency-based obesity education interventions from the learner perspective.
aimTo develop and implement a pilot, multi-institutional, competency-based obesity medicine curriculum intervention, with the learner perspective as the primary outcome. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: We developed and implemented an educational intervention grounded in social constructivist learning theory and guided by the logic model framework. Students provided self-rating on each of the 32 obesity medicine competencies and their beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge of obesity medicine, both pre- and post-interventions. SETTING AND
participantsEight diverse US medical schools participated (September 2023-October 2025); pre- and post-intervention surveys were completed by 1829 (60%) and 1187 (39%) students, respectively. The dialogue within school-based teams was supported by an expert steering committee that provided scaffolding and expertise. PROGRAM EVALUATION: Following the intervention, students reported significantly (p < 0.001) higher ratings across all 32 obesity medicine competencies (3.15 ± 0.56 vs. 2.79 ± 0.72; mean ± SD), higher knowledge about obesity (3.00 ± 0.29 vs. 2.92 ± 0.29; mean ± SD), lower negative beliefs (2.08 ± 0.41 vs. 2.82 ± 0.44; mean ± SD), and higher positive attitudes toward patients with obesity (3.55 ± 0.40 vs. 1.53 ± 0.41; mean ± SD). DISCUSSION: This large study approach demonstrates feasibility and scalability of a multi-institutional collaborative framework for addressing the curricular gap in obesity medicine education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42870177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.