ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
"Most of what I do is a workaround now": Clinician Use of Workarounds Following an EHR Transition.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is transitioning from a homegrown electronic health record (EHR) system to a single-vendor Federal EHR system, the largest EHR transition in history. Research shows that this transition was profoundly disruptive to care during the early implementation phase, yet limited data exist on clinician experience with and response to the transition in the years following implementation of the new system.
objectiveTo investigate the use and perceptions of workarounds among VA clinicians using the new Federal EHR system.
designA descriptive exploratory qualitative study.
participantsUsing a mix of purposive and snowball sampling, we recruited direct care clinicians across a range of professions currently employed at the first five VA medical sites to transition to the new Federal EHR. Of the 104 clinicians invited, 30 (28.8%) participated in interviews. APPROACH: We conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians approximately 1.5 to 4 years post-go-live across sites. We performed a hybrid inductive-deductive content analysis using an approach that combined templated summaries with matrix analysis. KEY
resultsWorkarounds emerged as highly salient to clinician experience with the new EHR. Analyses generated four themes relevant to EHR workarounds: (1) ongoing EHR-related challenges impeded clinicians' job performance; (2) workarounds emerged in response to continued EHR challenges; (3) workarounds were perceived as necessary but risky to patients, users, and the health care system; and (4) as EHR problems persisted, workarounds became routine.
conclusionsMany of VA's EHR transition challenges have persisted beyond the initial implementation phase, contributing to a reliance on workarounds to overcome obstacles to care delivery. Workarounds were perceived as both beneficial and risky to users, patients, and the healthcare system. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating the role and impact of workarounds during EHR-to-EHR transitions to inform system improvements and workflow optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42870171What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.