ArticleJournal of plant research2026
Mechanical mismatch of pollination-related traits causes severe pollen limitation in the Roscoea purpurea-Philoliche longirostris mutualism.
Article in Journal of plant research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The geographical variation in the strength and direction of selection in highly specialized plant-pollinator mutualisms can lead to different interaction outcomes among populations. In this study, we investigated the mutualistic interaction between an alpine ginger Roscoea purpurea and a long-tongued tabanid fly Philoliche longirostris across eight populations in central Nepal. We measured the flower and fly traits, assessed the visitation behaviour and frequencies of P. longirostris, and quantified the reproductive success of R. purpurea. Our results revealed that in three of the eight populations both nectar distance and corolla-tube length were longer than the fly proboscis length, indicating a clear mechanical mismatch between the interacting traits of plants and the fly. The visitation frequencies of the fly to R. purpurea flowers were substantially lower in the three populations compared to the other five populations, yet the fly did not visit any co-flowering species. In the three populations, the pollen limitation indices for both fruit set and seed set were over 0.95 indicating that plant reproduction was severely pollen limited. We suggest that if the mechanical mismatch is a persistent feature of the populations, it may eventually lead to a mutualism breakdown between R. purpurea and P. longirostris, which would have severe consequences for the existence of both organisms, particularly in the populations encountering mechanical mismatch between the interacting traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42870167What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.