ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Semi-Automated Image Labeling and Object Tracking for MR-Guided Radiotherapy Using a Foundation Vision Model.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) enables real-time tracking of tumor and organ motion for more precise radiation delivery. However, existing clinical tracking software struggles with high-velocity or non-rigid motion. Foundation models, such as Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2) and MedSAM2, offer robust tracking with fast inference speeds and strong zero-shot accuracy that can improve with fine-tuning. Fine-tuning typically uses expert-labeled datasets, which are expensive to acquire. We explored SAM2's utility in accelerating the labeling process by developing a workflow where novices label < 1% of frames and SAM2 automatically labels the rest. We then evaluated SAM2 and MedSAM2 for tumor tracking on an open-access MRgRT dataset in three configurations: zero-shot, fine-tuned using manually labeled data, and fine-tuned using the semi-automatically labeled data. We measured accuracy with the Dice similarity coefficient, 95th percentile (P95) Hausdorff distance, and centroid distance. MedSAM2 and SAM2 demonstrated strong zero-shot tracking accuracy with no significant difference among the model variants. Fine-tuning significantly improved Dice coefficients (0.874 to 0.891, p = 0.006), P95 Hausdorff distances (9.069 to 4.378 mm, p < 0.001), and centroid distances (5.299 to 1.769 mm, p < 0.001) relative to zero-shot, with no significant difference between using manually labeled and semi-automatically labeled data. Therefore, leveraging SAM2 to semi-automatically generate labeled training data can substantially reduce the cost of data curation and long-term model maintenance without compromising accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42870163What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.