Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42870163›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Semi-Automated Image Labeling and Object Tracking for MR-Guided Radiotherapy Using a Foundation Vision Model.

Mike Zhu, Jun Hsuang Jen, Daniel E Hyer, Taylor P Trentadue, Timothy L Kline, Bryan J Traughber, Douglas J Moseley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mike ZhuDepartment of Information Technology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. zhu.henian@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4583-8162
Jun Hsuang JenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6467-7910
Daniel E HyerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7638-9599
Taylor P TrentadueMayo Clinic Medical Scientist Training Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0390-3243
Timothy L KlineDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Bryan J TraughberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Douglas J MoseleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8030-8408

Funding

Medical Scientist Traning Program at Mayo ClinicT32GM065841 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KAUFMANN, SCOTT H, SCHIMMENTI, LISA A · 2003 to 2022
$5.8M
MSTP at Mayo Clinic RochesterT32GM145408 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SCOTT H KAUFMANN, LISA A SCHIMMENTI · 2023 to 2026
$4.7M
Assessing scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthrokinematics using 4DCTF31AR082227 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI TRENTADUE, TAYLOR PATRICIA · 2023 to 2025
$116k
NIAMS NIH HHS F31 AR082227NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM065841NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) enables real-time tracking of tumor and organ motion for more precise radiation delivery. However, existing clinical tracking software struggles with high-velocity or non-rigid motion. Foundation models, such as Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2) and MedSAM2, offer robust tracking with fast inference speeds and strong zero-shot accuracy that can improve with fine-tuning. Fine-tuning typically uses expert-labeled datasets, which are expensive to acquire. We explored SAM2's utility in accelerating the labeling process by developing a workflow where novices label < 1% of frames and SAM2 automatically labels the rest. We then evaluated SAM2 and MedSAM2 for tumor tracking on an open-access MRgRT dataset in three configurations: zero-shot, fine-tuned using manually labeled data, and fine-tuned using the semi-automatically labeled data. We measured accuracy with the Dice similarity coefficient, 95th percentile (P95) Hausdorff distance, and centroid distance. MedSAM2 and SAM2 demonstrated strong zero-shot tracking accuracy with no significant difference among the model variants. Fine-tuning significantly improved Dice coefficients (0.874 to 0.891, p = 0.006), P95 Hausdorff distances (9.069 to 4.378 mm, p < 0.001), and centroid distances (5.299 to 1.769 mm, p < 0.001) relative to zero-shot, with no significant difference between using manually labeled and semi-automatically labeled data. Therefore, leveraging SAM2 to semi-automatically generate labeled training data can substantially reduce the cost of data curation and long-term model maintenance without compromising accuracy.

Indexed as

Adaptive radiotherapyMedical physicsMR-linacRadiation oncologySegment anything modelSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID42870163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.