ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Development and External Testing of an Interpretable MRI-Based Machine Learning Model for Differentiating Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma from Cellular Leiomyoma.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This retrospective two-center diagnostic study was aimed at developing and externally testing an interpretable MRI-based machine learning model for differentiating endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) from cellular leiomyoma (CL). A total of 155 women with pathologically confirmed ESS or CL were assigned to a derivation cohort (n = 111) and an external testing cohort (n = 44). Clinical variables, qualitative MRI features, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram parameters were evaluated. Three MRI-derived predictors-irregular tumor margin, cystic areas on T2-weighted imaging, and mean ADC-were used to train six classifiers. The final support vector machine model with a radial basis function kernel was evaluated at a fixed threshold determined in the derivation cohort using receiver operating characteristic, calibration, decision curve, and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analyses. A reader study assessed the effect of model assistance. The model achieved areas under the curve of 0.843 (95% CI, 0.760-0.917) in the derivation cohort and 0.835 (95% CI, 0.669-0.960) in the external testing cohort. Calibration and decision curve analyses indicated acceptable performance and potential clinical utility. In an exploratory model-assisted reader analysis, junior radiologist specificity increased from 46.4 to 82.1% and accuracy from 52.3 to 77.3%. This interpretable three-feature model demonstrated promising performance across cohorts and may serve as an adjunctive tool for preoperative MRI assessment, although prospective multicenter validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42870161What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.