ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Deep Learning-Based Automated Computed Tomography Classification of Posterior Malleolar Fractures for a Standardized Diagnostic Framework.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in computed tomography (CT)-based classification systems for posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs), diagnostic consistency remains limited because these systems are still highly dependent on the observer's experience. This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based automated model capable of classifying PMFs according to the Haraguchi, Mason-Molloy, and Bartoníček-Rammelt clasification systems using CT scans, and to compare the classification performance of different convolutional neural network architectures. Retrospectively collected preoperative CT data from 480 adult patients with PMFs were analyzed. A total of 2398 CT slices were independently classified by three orthopedic surgeons according to the three classification systems, and majority consensus was used as the reference standard. Anonymized DICOM images were evaluated using VGG-16, ResNet-101, and DenseNet-121 architectures. The dataset was divided into 60% training, 20% validation, and 20% testing subsets. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, precision, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The VGG-16 and ResNet-101 models demonstrated high classification performance in the Haraguchi and Mason-Molloy systems. In the VGG-16 model, AUC values exceeded 0.90 across most fracture subtypes, reaching particularly high levels in Haraguchi types I-III, Mason-Molloy types IIB and III, and Bartoníček-Rammelt type IV. Similarly, the ResNet-101 model achieved AUC values above 0.90 in most classes, with very high discriminative performance observed in selected subtypes. F1-scores were greater than 0.70 among most fracture categories and exceeded 0.80 in several, indicating strong and consistent classification performance. These findings demonstrate that deep learning-based automated CT classification of PMFs is feasible and diagnostically robust. The proposed framework may improve diagnostic consistency, reduce observer-dependent variability, and support standardized assessment of posterior malleolar fractures in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42870158What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.