ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
The transposed-word effect persists across text orientations in Chinese.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In speeded grammaticality decision tasks, the transposed-word effect occurs when ungrammatical word sequences created by swapping adjacent words in an otherwise grammatical sentence are harder to reject than control sequences derived from ungrammatical base sentences, providing evidence for flexible word-order processing during reading. Previous research shows that this effect is often attenuated in atypical display formats, including serial word presentation and backward text, especially in RTs. Some accounts interpret this pattern as a shift from parallel processing, in which multiple words are recognised simultaneously, towards more serial word recognition. However, atypical formats may also disrupt component processes supporting reading, including eye guidance, spatial attention, and parafoveal processing, thereby reducing the uptake of information from adjacent words. We extended this work to Chinese, a script that can be read in horizontal and vertical orientations while individual characters remain upright. Two hundred native Chinese readers made speeded grammaticality decisions to five-word sequences presented left-to-right, top-to-bottom, right-to-left, or bottom-to-top. Robust transposed-word effects occurred in both accuracy and RTs across all orientations. Effects were largest for conventional left-to-right text and smaller in all three atypical orientations. Thus, attenuation occurred even though all words remained simultaneously visible. It was therefore not confined to formats that physically enforce serial presentation. Although attenuation may reflect a shift towards more serial word recognition, it could also arise because difficulty processing atypically oriented text narrows spatial attention and reduces parafoveal information uptake. These component-process changes can occur under either parallel or serial accounts, making the findings compatible with both.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42870139What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.