ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Reproducibility and diagnostic performance of ADC for assessing response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multi-ROI comparison analysis from the phase-Ib NABUCCO trial.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMRI is increasingly used to assess treatment response in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), but only qualitatively. This study evaluates the reproducibility and predictive value of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), thought to be a non-invasive surrogate for tumor cell density, in patients with MIBC receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. MATERIALS AND
methodsMRI data from 35 patients, enrolled in the Phase-Ib NABUCCO trial, were analyzed. ADC maps were derived from pre- and post-treatment MRI scans. Three independent radiologists assessed multiple regions of interest (ROIs) to evaluate inter-observer agreement and predictive performance for pathological complete response (pCR). ADC values were normalized using muscle tissue as a reference. Additionally, we analyzed the correlation between ADC and cell densities, derived from multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) data.
resultsADC measurements from the whole-tumor ROI (n = 25) demonstrated the highest reproducibility (0.98, 95% CI = [0.95-0.99]), but lacked predictive value (AUC = 0.31, 95% CI = [0.12-0.53], p = 0.109). The most hypointense ROI (n = 22) showed the strongest predictive value for pCR (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI = [0.57-1], p = 0.025), though with limited reproducibility. The difference between baseline and follow-up ADC values in the hypointense region (n = 20) again showed the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI = [0.58-0.98], p = 0.015). Although muscle normalization is proposed to reduce scanner variability, it did not improve predictive performance in this cohort and occasionally reduced reproducibility. No significant correlation was found between whole-tumor ADC and cell density.
conclusionDespite analyzing different measurement techniques for ADC values, none was simultaneously reproducible and predictive, nor provided insights into the biology of the tumor. While ADC shows promise in MIBC, there is an urgent need for more standardized, robust imaging biomarkers. KEY POINTS: Question Non-invasive biomarkers are urgently needed to guide bladder-preserving strategies in MIBC. Findings DWI-MRI shows promise, but standardized robust imaging biomarkers are essential for reliable response assessment. Critical relevance statement Standardized or AI-assisted ROI segmentation could improve ADC reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy in multicenter studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.