Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42870138›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2026

Reproducibility and diagnostic performance of ADC for assessing response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multi-ROI comparison analysis from the phase-Ib NABUCCO trial.

Joyce Greidanus, Carlotta Bernabei, Kalina Chupetvloska, Georgios Agrotis, Laura S Mertens, Bas W G van Rhijn, Henk G van der Poel, Michiel S van der Heijden, Regina G H Beets-Tan, Andrea Delli Pizzi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Joyce Greidanus *Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands. joycegreidanus@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6530-5925
Carlotta Bernabei *Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Kalina ChupetvloskaDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Georgios AgrotisDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Laura S MertensDepartment of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Bas W G van RhijnDepartment of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Henk G van der PoelDepartment of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Michiel S van der HeijdenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Regina G H Beets-TanGROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Andrea Delli PizziDepartment of Radiology, Santissima Annunziata Hospital, University "G. D'Annunzio", Chieti, Italy.
Thierry N BoellaardDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Stefano TrebeschiDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMRI is increasingly used to assess treatment response in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), but only qualitatively. This study evaluates the reproducibility and predictive value of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), thought to be a non-invasive surrogate for tumor cell density, in patients with MIBC receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsMRI data from 35 patients, enrolled in the Phase-Ib NABUCCO trial, were analyzed. ADC maps were derived from pre- and post-treatment MRI scans. Three independent radiologists assessed multiple regions of interest (ROIs) to evaluate inter-observer agreement and predictive performance for pathological complete response (pCR). ADC values were normalized using muscle tissue as a reference. Additionally, we analyzed the correlation between ADC and cell densities, derived from multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) data.

resultsADC measurements from the whole-tumor ROI (n = 25) demonstrated the highest reproducibility (0.98, 95% CI = [0.95-0.99]), but lacked predictive value (AUC = 0.31, 95% CI = [0.12-0.53], p = 0.109). The most hypointense ROI (n = 22) showed the strongest predictive value for pCR (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI = [0.57-1], p = 0.025), though with limited reproducibility. The difference between baseline and follow-up ADC values in the hypointense region (n = 20) again showed the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI = [0.58-0.98], p = 0.015). Although muscle normalization is proposed to reduce scanner variability, it did not improve predictive performance in this cohort and occasionally reduced reproducibility. No significant correlation was found between whole-tumor ADC and cell density.

conclusionDespite analyzing different measurement techniques for ADC values, none was simultaneously reproducible and predictive, nor provided insights into the biology of the tumor. While ADC shows promise in MIBC, there is an urgent need for more standardized, robust imaging biomarkers. KEY POINTS: Question Non-invasive biomarkers are urgently needed to guide bladder-preserving strategies in MIBC. Findings DWI-MRI shows promise, but standardized robust imaging biomarkers are essential for reliable response assessment. Critical relevance statement Standardized or AI-assisted ROI segmentation could improve ADC reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy in multicenter studies.

Indexed as

Apparent diffusion coefficientMRI biomarkersMuscle-invasive bladder cancerNeoadjuvant immunotherapyResponse assessment

Identifiers

PMID42870138
PMCPMC13661850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.