Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42870120›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neuro-oncology2026

Radiological features of peritumoral brain injury and neurological outcomes after glioma surgery: a prospective observational study.

Jintong Cheng, Zhenghe Chen, Depei Li, Zhuoxin Guo, Yadi Yang, Xiao Luo, Ji Zhang, Yinsheng Chen, Xiaobing Jiang, Fuhua Lin and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jintong Cheng *Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Zhenghe Chen *Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Depei LiDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Zhuoxin GuoDepartment of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Yadi YangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Xiao LuoState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Ji ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Yinsheng ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Xiaobing JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Fuhua LinDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Qinqin ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Zhihuan ZhouDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Zhongping ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China. chenzhp@sysucc.org.cn.

Funding

Cancer Innovative Research Program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center CIRP-SYSUCC-PT13120101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite significant advances in glioma surgery, early postoperative neuroimaging frequently reveals signs of surgical brain injury (SBI). This prospective observational study aimed to investigate the incidence, radiological characteristics, neurological outcomes and risk factors of SBI following glioma resection.

methodsPatients with newly diagnosed supratentorial gliomas who undergo tumor resection were prospectively enrolled. Serial MRI examinations were administrated early postoperative (≤ 72 h) and on postoperative days 7, 14 and 28 to assess the characteristics of infarction, edema and microhemorrhage. Neurological outcomes were evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at postoperative day 28.

resultsA total of 64 patients was included. Postoperative infarction was identified in 14 patients (21.9%), with all anatomically localized to the basal ganglia, thalamus, or insular regions. Intraoperative blood loss ≥ 300 mL was independently associated with postoperative infarction (Odd Ratio [OR]: 4.62, p = 0.035). Microhemorrhage was observed in 53.8% of patients. Peritumoral edema occurred in all cases and exhibited two distinct patterns: residual tumor-associated edema (n = 42) and de novo surgery-induced edema (n = 22). The average volume of tumor-associated edema decreased, whereas that of surgery-induced edema increased over time. Among the 53 patients who completed neurological outcome assessments, 13 developed disability (mRS ≥ 2). Risk factors were higher intraoperative blood loss (OR: 8.88, p = 0.013) and postoperative infarction (OR: 6.33, p = 0.031).

conclusionSBI, including infarction and edema, is common following glioma surgery and associated with adverse neurological outcomes. Meticulous intraoperative hemostatic management is essential to prevent postoperative infarction and even disability outcome.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesBrain NeoplasmsGliomaNeurosurgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedBrain EdemaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesBrain edemaBrain infarctionBrain injuryGlioma surgeryProspective observational study

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.