ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2026
Efsubaglutide Alfa: A Comprehensive Pharmacological Review.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efsubaglutide alfa (also known as supaglutide) is a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) engineered as a GLP-1 analogue fused to a human immunoglobulin G2 (IgG2) fragment crystallisable (Fc) domain. This narrative review summarises published and publicly available evidence on efsubaglutide alfa pharmacology, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, dose-exposure-response relationships, drug-drug interaction potential, and clinical efficacy and safety in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and overweight/obesity. Efsubaglutide alfa has prolonged exposure (terminal half-life approximately 182-215 h) and low steady-state fluctuation, but dosing-interval selection should not be inferred from half-life alone. Available population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analyses indicate that steady-state trough concentration is most informative for glycaemic response, whereas average and peak concentrations contribute to interpretation of weight response and gastrointestinal tolerability. Across available studies, predominantly conducted in Chinese populations, efsubaglutide alfa shows class-consistent improvements in glycaemic control and body weight, with gastrointestinal adverse events as the main tolerability limitation. Exploratory every 2-week dosing and post-discontinuation glycaemic durability findings remain hypothesis-generating. No head-to-head comparative trials dedicated cardiovascular or renal outcome trials, or large globally diverse datasets are yet available; therefore, the current evidence should be interpreted as a clinical pharmacology synthesis rather than a comparative positioning claim.
Identifiers
42870102What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.