Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42870077›Full record

ArticleLab animal2026

Laboratory conditions matter: social housing in male and female laboratory mice in a multicenter study approach.

Anne S Mallien, Anna Munk, Anne Rix, Miriam A Vogt, Natascha Pfeiffer, Verena Buchecker, Renee Girbig, Sarah Neunecker, Laura Becker, Monika Franz and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lab animal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Anne S MallienResearch Group Animal Models in Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. anne.mallien@zi-mannheim.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8082-6798
Anna MunkInstitute of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7550-9053
Anne RixInstitute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Miriam A VogtInterfaculty Biomedical Research Facility, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3400-5067
Natascha PfeifferResearch Group Animal Models in Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Verena BucheckerInstitute of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Renee GirbigInstitute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Sarah NeuneckerInterfaculty Biomedical Research Facility, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Laura BeckerResearch Group Animal Models in Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Monika FranzInstitute of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Jasmin BaierInstitute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Christiane BrandweinResearch Group Animal Models in Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
André BleichHannover Medical School, Institute for Laboratory Animal Science, Hannover, Germany.
Rupert PalmeDepartment of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9466-3662
René TolbaInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science and Experimental Surgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Heidrun PotschkaInstitute of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Fabian KießlingInstitute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Sabine ChourbajiInterfaculty Biomedical Research Facility, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Steven R Talbot *Hannover Medical School, Institute for Laboratory Animal Science, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9062-4065
Peter Gass *Research Group Animal Models in Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. peter.gass@zi-mannheim.de.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01EE2304ADeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 321137804Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) BL 953/11-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) GA-427/12-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) KI 1072/20-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) PO 681/9-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) TA 2072/1-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite numerous studies and literature reviews, the social housing of laboratory mice is still under debate. Aggression and social stress can lead to physiological and behavioral alterations, especially in male mice, whereas single housing is a potential source of discomfort, particularly in female mice. This multicenter study aimed to assess the impact of single versus group housing on severity in both sexes and to examine whether a general recommendation could be made. C57BL/6NRj mice from the same litters of a commercial breeder were housed either singly or in groups of four across four different laboratory sites. Here we assessed fecal corticosterone metabolite concentration, aggressive behavior, wound scores and observed behavioral readouts on locomotion, stress coping in the forced swim test, burrowing, nesting and anxiety. Differences due to social housing conditions were not very pronounced. Instead, we found that, despite harmonization efforts, the differences in outcomes across the four laboratory sites were substantial. Furthermore, the individuality of the mice appears to have an additional influence on the results. These findings suggest that optimal housing is not generalizable but depends on the specific laboratory conditions. Beyond meeting the minimum housing standards as set by legislation, we should actively embrace refinement as a guiding principle and strive to create housing conditions that not only meet scientific needs but also continuously improve the welfare of the animals entrusted to our care.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.