ArticleLab animal2026
Laboratory conditions matter: social housing in male and female laboratory mice in a multicenter study approach.
Article in Lab animal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite numerous studies and literature reviews, the social housing of laboratory mice is still under debate. Aggression and social stress can lead to physiological and behavioral alterations, especially in male mice, whereas single housing is a potential source of discomfort, particularly in female mice. This multicenter study aimed to assess the impact of single versus group housing on severity in both sexes and to examine whether a general recommendation could be made. C57BL/6NRj mice from the same litters of a commercial breeder were housed either singly or in groups of four across four different laboratory sites. Here we assessed fecal corticosterone metabolite concentration, aggressive behavior, wound scores and observed behavioral readouts on locomotion, stress coping in the forced swim test, burrowing, nesting and anxiety. Differences due to social housing conditions were not very pronounced. Instead, we found that, despite harmonization efforts, the differences in outcomes across the four laboratory sites were substantial. Furthermore, the individuality of the mice appears to have an additional influence on the results. These findings suggest that optimal housing is not generalizable but depends on the specific laboratory conditions. Beyond meeting the minimum housing standards as set by legislation, we should actively embrace refinement as a guiding principle and strive to create housing conditions that not only meet scientific needs but also continuously improve the welfare of the animals entrusted to our care.
Identifiers
42870077What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.