ArticleOdontology2026
Effect of air-abrasion and air-polishing powders on dentin hydraulic conductance before and after acid challenge.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Air-polishing and air-abrasion powders may contact exposed dentin, but their effects on fluid transport after acid exposure remain unclear. This in vitro study compared hydraulic conductance before and after powder application and acid challenge. Forty-two 1.0-mm coronal dentin discs were allocated (n = 7/group) to calcium sodium phosphosilicate bioactive glass (Sylc Powder), silica-coated aluminum oxide (CoSil Powder), sodium bicarbonate (AquaCare Sodium Bicarbonate), erythritol with 0.3% chlorhexidine (AIRFLOW PLUS Powder), sodium bicarbonate (AIRFLOW CLASSIC Powder), or untreated control. After 6% citric-acid conditioning for 10 min, baseline conductance was measured. Powders were applied for 15 s, and conductance was measured immediately. After 2% citric acid for 2 min, conductance was remeasured immediately. At 3 psi, 50-µL water transit was normalized to exposed area and pressure and expressed as µL·min⁻¹·cm⁻²·cmH₂O⁻¹. Data were analyzed by two-way mixed repeated-measures analysis of variance, stage-specific Tukey comparisons, and two-sided paired t tests with Holm adjustment. Stage (F(2, 72) = 117.95, p < 0.001) and the group-by-stage interaction (F(10, 72) = 11.77, p < 0.001) were significant. Conductance decreased from baseline in all five active groups (Holm-adjusted p ≤ 0.003) but not in the control (p = 0.681). After acid challenge, Sylc Powder remained lower than all other groups (p ≤ 0.014). Scanning electron microscopy provided illustrative morphology. Under this 15-s application and 2-min challenge protocol, responses depended on powder and stage; bioactive glass produced the most persistent reduction, whereas the other powders returned toward baseline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42870074What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.