ArticleOdontology2026
Effect of moisture control on root caries progression adjacent to different restorative materials in an in-vitro biofilm model.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the impact of moisture control on the risk of caries progression to root restorations (CAR) made of resin composite (RC) or glass ionomer cements (GIC) under conditions of absolute or inadequate moisture control in an in vitro model. In each of the sixty caries-free human maxillary premolars, standardized mesial and distal cavities were prepared 5 mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction. The specimens were randomly allocated to the experimental groups RC-Z250 (Scotchbond Universal SE & Z250, 3M, Seefeld, Germany), GIC-DF (DeltaFil, DMG, Hamburg, Germany), GIC-EF (Equia Forte, GC, Tokyo, Japan), and GIC-KF (Ketac Fil, 3M, Seefeld, Germany) (n = 15). In each group, restorations were placed either simulating conditions of absolute (Control) or inadequate (Test) moisture control. After water storage for 100d (37°C, 100% humidity), specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10.000 thermal cycles; 5-55°C), and a continuous-culture Lactobacillus rhamnosus biofilm model for 10d. The integrated mineral loss ΔZ was measured along the tooth-restoration interface (dentin wall lesion; DWL) and the outer surface of the root dentin (dentin surface lesion; DSL) using transverse microradiography. Only group RC-Z250 exhibited significant differences in mineral losses ΔZ between Control and Test lesions in DSLs (ΔZ
Indexed as
Identifiers
42870070What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.