ReviewEMBO molecular medicine2026
Artificial intelligence in central nervous system autoimmune diseases: from clinical decision support to mechanistic discovery and translation.
Review in EMBO molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) autoimmune diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), autoimmune encephalitis (AE), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), remain difficult to diagnose, stratify, and treat because clinical phenotypes overlap, biomarkers are imperfect, and the disease course requires longitudinal observation. Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being evaluated to integrate clinical, imaging, immunological, and molecular data for decision-making in neuroimmunology. Clinical applications include automated neuroimaging analysis, differential diagnosis, disease classification, relapse prediction, prognostic stratification, and risk-informed care planning. Evidence is unevenly distributed: MS has the largest body of published work, particularly in neuroimaging, whereas studies in NMOSD, AE, and MOGAD are smaller, more heterogeneous, and often lack external validation. Computational approaches are also being applied to multi-omics, single-cell and spatial data, molecular target prioritisation, drug repositioning, trial enrichment, digital biomarkers, federated learning, and longitudinal modelling; however, these applications generally provide association, prioritisation, or hypothesis-generating evidence rather than validated therapeutic benefit. This Review maps reported applications, evidence patterns, and methodological and implementation needs rather than ranking translational maturity or implying established clinical benefit.
Identifiers
42870063What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.