ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026
Virtual reality (bio-)markers differentiate ADHD from depression and controls.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The heterogeneity of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and its symptom overlap with other mental disorders limit the clinical utility of isolated diagnostic markers. Virtual reality (VR)-based paradigms offer potential to aid individual diagnostic decisions. This study investigated the diagnostic value of classification models based on multimodal data derived from a virtual email sorting task (VEST). Data were pooled from two studies and used to distinguish unmedicated participants with ADHD (n = 43) from medicated participants with ADHD (n = 23), participants with major depressive disorder (MDD, n = 16), and control participants (n = 21). During the VEST, objective measures of task performance, head actigraphy, and eye tracking were recorded. Subjective data were obtained by assessing task-related ADHD symptoms. Using nested cross-validation, support vector machines were trained and tested, comparing model performance between objective, subjective and combined parameters. The highest balanced accuracy for the classification of participants with ADHD versus control participants (0.85) was achieved by a single-feature model using self-reported inattentiveness. Participants with ADHD and MDD were differentiated with 0.75 balanced accuracy using a 13-feature model combining subjective and objective measures. A 13-feature model derived exclusively from objective measures yielded 0.64 balanced accuracy for the differentiation of medicated versus unmedicated participants with ADHD yet did not perform significantly above chance level. These findings underscore the potential of VR-based multimodal assessments and machine learning to advance precision diagnostics and highlight the utility of self-report measures to detect ADHD while demonstrating the diagnostic potential of objective measures to distinguish disorders and capture medication effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42869999What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.