Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42869991›Full record

ArticleHeredity2026

Genomic models for accurate estimation of breeding values in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis Bong. Carr).

J A Woolliams, M Janes, H Tumas, J J Ilska, J P McLean, J E Cottrell, J Mackay, G Gorjanc

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J A WoolliamsThe Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland, UK.
M JanesThe Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland, UK.
H TumasDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
J J IlskaThe Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1563-0174
J P McLeanNorthern Research Station, Forest Research, Midlothian, UK.
J E CottrellNorthern Research Station, Forest Research, Midlothian, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6355-1326
J MackayDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4883-195X
G GorjancThe Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland, UK. gregor.gorjanc@roslin.ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8008-2787

Funding

RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/P020488/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BBS/E/D/30002275RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BBS/E/RL/230001ARCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BBS/E/RL/230001C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomics is advancing estimation of breeding values for selective breeding. Traditional pedigree information used in the estimation of breeding values can still be competitive to genomic information when markers do not adequately capture genetic variance or genomic datasets are not sufficiently large. Using the UK Sitka spruce breeding population as a study system, we assessed the accuracy of estimated breeding values using pedigree or genomic information. Nine phenotypic traits associated with growth and wood quality were measured across 1295 individuals in 50 full-sib families replicated across two plantation sites. Pedigree-based estimation was compared to genome-based estimation using identity by state (IBS) or identity by descent (IBD) information from 4123 SNPs. Accuracy of estimated breeding values was assessed using model-based standard errors, which assumes the fitted model and parameters are correct, and more objective 12-fold cross-validation by withholding some phenotypes from the model fitting. Accuracies obtained directly from the model were very similar across different types of information, but cross-validation showed genomic information gave highest accuracies for all but one of the traits. No bias was observed for any of the trait- information combinations. Results demonstrate that the estimation of breeding values with genomic information in this study system is already competitive with the pedigree information, despite evidence that the marker panel did not capture the full genetic variance. Furthermore, accuracies with genomic information have the potential to significantly improve, unlike pedigree, by increasing the size of the training set and marker density.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.