Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42869983›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2026

Little evidence for cultural differences in automatic imitation.

Oliver Genschow, Mareike Westfal, Angela R Dorrough, Emiel Cracco, Tobias Wingen, Jan Crusius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Oliver GenschowSchool of Management and Technology, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany. oliver.genschow@leuphana.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6322-4392
Mareike WestfalSchool of Management and Technology, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.
Angela R DorroughSocial Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5645-949X
Emiel CraccoSchool of Management and Technology, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.
Tobias WingenFaculty of Psychology, FernUniversität in Hagen, Hagen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1559-859X
Jan CrusiusInstitute for Psychology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9403-6084

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals tend to automatically imitate others' actions. Such imitative behavior is often assumed to be a universal phenomenon. However, most prior research has focused on Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) populations, leaving open whether people across different cultures imitate others in a similar manner. Ideomotor theory and the theory of objective self-awareness suggest that imitation is influenced by the extent to which individuals focus on the self versus others. Since cultural background strongly shapes self-construal-particularly along the collectivism-individualism dimension-cultural context may play a key role in shaping imitative behavior. To test this prediction, we examined automatic imitation in representative samples across 22 culturally diverse nations varying in collectivism and individualism. Consistent with prior findings, we replicated the basic automatic imitation effect across all countries but found no compelling evidence for cultural differences in automatic imitation. These findings hint to the possibility that automatic imitation is a universal phenomenon with little room for strong modulations by culture.

Identifiers

PMID42869983
PMCPMC13661571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.