ArticleNature biomedical engineering2026
Repurposing adult AI radiograph models for neonatal care through continual learning: an international multicentre study.
Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microphysiological models of human gastrointestinal diseases.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
75 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite growing clinical adoption of artificial intelligence in radiology, fewer than one in five commercially available models are cleared for paediatric use. Existing systems are trained predominantly on adult data and generalize poorly to neonates, yet efficient strategies for repurposing them without data sharing or large-scale local data curation are lacking. Here we present an international retrospective study of neonatal chest radiographs from 30 neonatal intensive care units across 20 countries and territories, evaluating continual learning as a privacy-preserving approach to adapt a deep learning model for adult endotracheal tube assessment to neonatal care. Each hospital contributed 50 radiographs for sequential model retraining without centralized data pooling. Continual learning achieved lower anatomical landmark localization error (0.67 cm versus 1.29 cm for hospital-specific fine-tuning and 4.30 cm for adult-only models) at 29 of 30 sites, with improved detection of deep intubations at 27 of 30 sites. These findings demonstrate that privacy-preserving collaborative learning can address critical gaps in paediatric AI deployment.
Identifiers
42869977What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.