ArticleNature cardiovascular research2026
A multiview video-text model detects obstructive coronary stenosis and predicts 1-year cardiovascular events from angiography.
Article in Nature cardiovascular research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Invasive coronary angiography is the reference standard for diagnosing coronary artery disease, yet assessment is subjective, and existing artificial-intelligence tools typically assess stenosis in individual frames or videos and do not integrate the full multiview angiographic study. Here we show that DeepCORO-CLIP, trained on 203,808 angiographic videos and reports from 28,117 patients, interprets whole multiple-video angiograms at once. It detects obstructive stenoses (≥70%), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.89 internally and externally, and identifies chronic total occlusion (AUROC = 0.90 to 0.95), intra-coronary thrombus and calcification (AUROC = 0.90 to 0.91). It also predicts 1-year cardiovascular events (AUROC = 0.79, 95% CI of 0.74 to 0.84, versus 0.65 for a model derived using clinical variables) and left ventricular ejection fraction (mean absolute error 7.3% versus 8.8% for a previous model), both achieved using coronary angiography alone. In a blinded review of 365 evaluations across 288 angiograms, its reports were clinically usable in 76% of evaluations versus 88% for cardiologists, with comparable false positives (17% versus 14%, P = 0.38); residual missed stenoses reflected an adjustable threshold rather than an absent signal.
Identifiers
42869976What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.