ArticleNature communications2026
Widespread declines of formerly common species reshape local assemblages over time.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite dramatic human-driven changes across ecosystems, local-scale aggregate biodiversity metrics are often surprisingly stable, even as communities experience substantial reorganization of species identities and relative abundances. While rare species are often thought to be more vulnerable to these changes, emerging evidence suggests that common species may experience disproportionately greater declines. To evaluate these alternatives, we synthesize population trends for species initially rare or common across assemblages from 4748 sites within 129 studies spanning terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems. We quantify how population trends relate to initial abundances using hierarchical Bayesian models that account for regression to the mean and include realm, taxon, and environmental covariates. We find consistently stronger declines among formerly common species in marine and terrestrial assemblages, while freshwater assemblages show no clear directional pattern. Rare species present at the start also decline, but less so than common species, while colonists that were not present at the start of the time series compensate for losses within the rarest abundance category. Climate change and anthropogenic drivers modulate these trends, with increasing temperature and non-climatic human pressures attenuating losses of initially common species, particularly in marine systems. Overall, we find widespread declines in common species through time, with potential functional consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.