ReviewSignal transduction and targeted therapy2026
Pulmonary nodules: classification, biomarkers, signaling pathways, diseases, early diagnosis and management.
Review in Signal transduction and targeted therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary nodules are increasingly detected by thoracic imaging and low-dose computed tomography-based lung cancer screening, but most are benign, transient, or indolent. Clinically, the key task is to distinguish nodules that require timely cancer-directed evaluation from those that can be safely observed. This review summarizes the classification, disease spectrum, risk assessment, early diagnosis, biomarkers, signaling mechanisms, translational models, and management of pulmonary nodules. We first distinguish imaging phenotypes and disease entities, then differentiate the individual-level models used to select candidates for lung cancer screening from the nodule-level models and structured reporting systems used after nodule detection. Low-dose computed tomography remains the foundation of screening and surveillance approaches, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, nonsurgical biopsy, surgical diagnosis, and local therapies play more selective roles depending on the probability of malignancy and patient fitness. Noninvasive biomarkers, including circulating cellular, nucleic acid, methylation, protein, autoantibody, extracellular vesicle, and metabolic analytes, are most likely to serve as adjuncts to imaging and clinical risk assessment rather than as stand-alone diagnostic tests. Artificial intelligence may support detection, workflow efficiency, malignancy risk reclassification, invasiveness assessment, and multimodal integration, but its value depends on external validation, calibration, implementation, and prospective evidence of management benefit. Mechanistic studies of adenocarcinoma spectrum subsolid nodules have implicated the involvement of early oncogenic signaling, genomic instability, immune escape, stromal and vascular remodeling, and adaptive survival pathways. Translational models can support mechanistic and procedural research, but do not replicate real-world nodule management in patients. Overall, care for pulmonary nodules should be risk-adapted, longitudinal, multidisciplinary, and patient-centered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.