Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42869489›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2026

The co-evolution of hominins and Stone Age culture.

Alastair Key

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The co-evolution of hominins and Stone Age culture.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alastair KeyDepartment of Archaeology, Cambridge University , Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5576-1200

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human biological and cultural evolution are tightly intertwined; the two display dependent relationships and each influences the trajectory of the other. Archaeological evidence for hominin culture first emerges ca 3.3 million years ago, but increasing data attests to an earlier, deeply rooted onset of gene-culture co-evolution in our lineage. Diverse phenotypic traits are linked to Stone Age culture via the latter's impact on the survival and success of early human populations. Hominin cognitive and language capabilities, along with the anatomy of the hand, are key examples. Similarly, variation in Stone Age culture can be linked to the biological traits of the populations from which it derives; important examples concern stone technologies, hunting strategies and social organization. The co-evolution of hominins and Stone Age culture is, therefore, complex, multi-factorial and one of the major stories in human origins research. Here, current understanding of hominin cultural and biological co-evolution prior to the advent of agriculture is reviewed, and new links between the fossil and archaeological records are drawn.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCultural EvolutionHominidaeAnimalsArchaeologyFossilsHumansAfrican archaeological recordAustralopithecusdual inheritancegene-culture co-evolutionHomostone tools

Identifiers

PMID42869489
PMCPMC13678621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.