ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2026
A global analysis of population differentiation at the major histocompatibility complex genes across tetrapods.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A global analysis of population differentiation at the major histocompatibility complex genes across tetrapods.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes are central to pathogen recognition by the adaptive immune system of jawed vertebrates, with MHC classes I and II (henceforth referred to as MHC-I and MHC-II, respectively) primarily mediating responses to intracellular and extracellular pathogens, respectively. Here, we tested the hypothesis that MHC-II genes show stronger population differentiation, reflecting spatially heterogeneous selection by extracellular pathogens. We compiled a global dataset comprising >3500 pairwise estimates of MHC differentiation across approximately 120 tetrapod species. Phylogenetically informed analyses revealed consistently stronger differentiation at MHC-II than at MHC-I genes, supporting stronger local adaptation to spatially variable selection by extracellular pathogens. Isolation by distance contributed broadly to MHC differentiation, indicating that balancing selection is insufficient to homogenize MHC variation over large geographical scales. Differentiation varied markedly among tetrapod lineages, reflecting the differences in dispersal capacity. We further showed that differentiation was modulated by the genomic architecture of the MHC region, and our theoretical simulations demonstrated that variation in MHC gene copy number can have contrasting effects on population differentiation, depending on the strength of balancing selection acting on each MHC class. Together, these findings elucidate the global patterns of immunogenetic differentiation and advance the mechanistic understanding of how extraordinary MHC variation is structured across space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.