ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2026
Switch costs reveal vocal-specific executive demands during flexible action selection in crows.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Switch costs reveal vocal-specific executive demands during flexible action selection in crows.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Crows and other corvids exhibit remarkable cognitive flexibility, exercising volitional control that allows them to select, initiate and withhold actions based on deliberate decisions rather than reflex. Among these behaviours, vocalizations are especially demanding, yet crows perform them with exceptional precision, paralleling core building blocks of human speech. Despite this, the executive mechanisms supporting intentional vocal control, and how they differ from those governing other voluntary actions, remain largely unknown. We trained carrion crows to produce either vocalizations or pecking responses to arbitrary visual cues presented in randomized, alternating or blocked sequences that controlled how often response modalities switched across trials. While crows performed both actions with high accuracy, vocalizations were consistently slower and more variable than pecking. Notably, vocalizations showed clear switch costs; transitions into vocal responses caused slower reaction times and occasional errors, whereas pecking was largely unaffected. These results show that crows can flexibly switch between motor modalities and that volitional vocalizations carry specific cognitive control demands, previously undescribed in birds. Crows thus stand out as a rare non-primate species in which volitional vocalizations integrate speed, accuracy and executive control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.