ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2026
Change in the demographic dynamics of a spatially structured population of a colonial waterbird after a perturbation affecting a large colony.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Change in the demographic dynamics of a spatially structured population of a colonial waterbird after a perturbation affecting a large colony.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Localized perturbations may affect spatially structured populations (SSPs) as a whole by altering dispersal between patches. Yet, such large-scale consequences remain poorly understood and may depend on the proportion of the SSP affected by the perturbation. Here, we used correlative analyses and integrated population models to investigate the impact of pond draining-localized perturbations of breeding site availability-on the structure and demographics of an SSP of black-headed gulls (Chroicocephalus ridibundus). Pond draining regularly affected patches occupied by colonies, reducing the occupancy probability of those patches in subsequent years, but causing no visible changes in population growth or structure as breeders relocated to unperturbed patches. However, the draining of the pond occupied by the largest colony in the system (64% of total breeders) triggered the immediate emigration of over 60% of breeders outside the SSP, with no subsequent recovery. In the following years, apparent survival showed increased interannual variability, suggesting greater sensitivity of the SSP to the perturbation of smaller colonies. Dispersal between colonies also became more uniform, reflecting the homogenization of colony sizes after the emigration event in a context of informed dispersal. Considering perturbation magnitude and dispersal mechanisms appears essential for understanding the response and resilience of SSPs to local perturbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.