ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2026
A data-driven framework to identify restenosis-prone regions in femoral arteries from geometric and inflow waveform parameters.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A data-driven framework to identify restenosis-prone regions in femoral arteries from geometric and inflow waveform parameters.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Haemodynamic indices derived from computational fluid dynamics (CFD), such as time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) and oscillatory shear index (OSI), are closely associated with restenosis risk in peripheral arterial disease (PAD). We present a machine learning-reduced order modelling (ML-ROM) framework to predict critical, restenosis-prone, haemodynamic regions accounting for both vessel geometries and inlet flow waveforms. We generated 500 parameterized virtual femoral-artery geometries, each paired with a synthetic physiologically realistic inflow waveform. CFD was used to obtain the wall shear stress (WSS) distribution, from which TAWSS and OSI were computed. Critical regions were then defined by applying different thresholding criteria based on TAWSS and OSI, as found in the literature. These were then used to construct ROMs using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD), and to train ML models from which the critical regions could be reconstructed. Four ML architectures were explored: a geometric-parameter-only model and three alternatives that also incorporate inflow waveform information via Fourier coefficients, long short-term memory (LSTM), and convolutional neural networks (CNN). The Fourier models achieved the highest predictive performance, with the median values of balanced accuracy (BA) exceeding 0.92 across all critical-region definitions. The model also offered a substantial speed-up ratio of the order of 109 compared with traditional CFD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.