Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42869464›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2026

The diverse effects of side reactions on the persistence of autocatalytic cycles.

Zhen Peng, Emily Spencer, David Baum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhen PengState Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, School of Biotechnology, East China University of Science and Technology , Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-2235-2341
Emily SpencerWisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI, USA.
David BaumWisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8334-6311

Funding

U.S. National Science Foundation DEB-2218817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key criticism of metabolism-first theories of abiogenesis is that, in the absence of specialized catalysts, side reactions would convert too many autocatalysts to inert by-products for autocatalytic systems to persist. Here, we use algebraic analysis and numerical simulations to explore the effects of side reactions on the persistence of simple autocatalytic systems. For an autocatalytic reaction coupled to a side reaction, whenever a component reaction is strictly irreversible, which is technically impossible but frequently considered an acceptable approximation, side reactions harm autocatalytic systems. But if all reactions are assumed reversible, perhaps with unequal forward and reverse rate constants, side reactions can have a wide range of effects-they can be harmful, neutral, beneficial, or harmful in the short term but beneficial in the longer term. These effects arise in the presence of reversible reactions, because side products can also serve as a reservoir from which autocatalysts can be re-derived. We then use algebraic analysis to confirm that such diverse effects also apply to a larger autocatalytic cycle coupled to more side reactions. Our results show that the effects of side reactions on autocatalytic systems do not provide sufficient grounds to reject metabolism-first models.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalModels, ChemicalCatalysisComputer SimulationKineticsautocatalysischemical reaction networksmetabolism-first theoriesorigins of lifestochastic chemical kinetics

Identifiers

PMID42869464
PMCPMC13682562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.