ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2026
Personalized haemodynamic modelling for non-invasive quantification of arterial stiffness in the human vasculature.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Personalized haemodynamic modelling for non-invasive quantification of arterial stiffness in the human vasculature.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arterial stiffness is a pivotal predictor of cardiovascular events, yet its in vivo characterization remains elusive because arterial wall mechanics cannot be directly measured. Conventional inverse approaches require high-resolution imaging to resolve wall motion, restricting their clinical applicability. Here, we present a non-invasive computational framework that infers regional arterial stiffness solely from routinely acquired pressure and blood flow velocity waveforms by leveraging personalized one-dimensional haemodynamic models of the human arterial network. Patient-specific models were constructed for 21 individuals with hypertension using stroke volume, arterial diameters, brachial pressures and carotid flow profiles. Regional stiffness parameters were identified through optimization to reconcile simulated and measured haemodynamics, and validated against brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity. The inferred stiffness demonstrated strong concordance with clinical measurements (r = 0.81; standard error = 279 cm s)-1. Longitudinal evaluation in 13 patients further revealed therapy-dependent remodelling, with calcium channel blockers selectively reducing pathological stiffening while preserving compliant vessels. Together, these results establish model-based inversion of standard haemodynamic data as a practical, scalable approach for quantifying arterial stiffness, enabling individualized cardiovascular risk assessment and treatment monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.