ArticlePoultry science2026
Protective effects of sanguinarine-baicalin salt in broilers challenged with avian pathogenic Escherichia coli O78.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) O78 causes acute colibacillosis in broilers and contributes to mortality, impaired growth, and multi-organ injury. This study evaluated the in vitro antibacterial activity and in vivo protective effects of sanguinarine-baicalin salt (SBS) in broilers subjected to an acute systemic APEC O78 challenge. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), bacterial growth, and biofilm formation were assessed in vitro. In vivo, broilers were intraperitoneally challenged with APEC O78 on days 11-13 and treated with dietary SBS at 5-320 mg/kg diet from day 14. Survival, growth performance, organ injury, serum biochemical and inflammatory indices, intestinal morphology, jejunal gene expression, cecal microbiota, and exploratory hepatic proteomic responses were evaluated. The MIC of SBS was 256 μg/mL, compared with 32 μg/mL for amoxicillin. SBS delayed bacterial growth but did not significantly inhibit biofilm formation under the tested conditions. In vivo, SBS improved survival, with the 20 mg/kg diet group showing the lowest treatment-period mortality. The 20-40 mg/kg diet range generally produced the most favorable overall responses, including improvements in growth performance, liver and spleen indices, and serum ALT, CREA, UA, and inflammatory cytokines. SBS treatment was also associated with improved intestinal morphology, increased transcription of barrier-related genes, reduced transcription of TLR4/NF-κB-related inflammatory genes, and changes in cecal microbial composition. Exploratory hepatic proteomics revealed APEC-associated alterations and treatment-associated shifts involving proteins related to cellular stress, redox homeostasis, tissue structure, and hepatic lipid and energy metabolism. Overall, dietary SBS showed protective effects against acute systemic APEC O78 challenge, accompanied by systemic, hepatic, and intestinal host responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.