Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42868847›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Evaluating broiler performance through yield, product quality, and economic value.

Hudson T Thames, Haley Nabors, Jonathan Moon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hudson T ThamesDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, United States. Electronic address: htt37@msstate.edu.
Haley NaborsDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, United States.
Jonathan MoonDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Broiler production has been optimized for maximum biological output, particularly breast meat yield; however, the economic implications of increased yield in the presence of quality defects are often not integrated into comprehensive evaluations of performance. The objective of this study was to integrate processing yield, myopathy incidence, and economic weighting into an expected value (EV) framework to evaluate broiler performance based on retained value rather than total output. A total of 768 broilers from two populations were evaluated across two production cycles. Carcass yield, parts yields, and the incidence of breast myopathies were assessed, and relationships among variables were explored using correlation and regression analyses. Expected value modeling was applied by combining predicted breast yield with woody breast (WB) severity distributions and value-based weighting factors. Population A had greater breast yield than population B (30.9 vs. 29.9 %; p = 0.001) and a stronger relationship between breast wt and carcass wt (R² = 0.97 vs. 0.28), but also greater incidence of moderate and severe WB. Consequently, value-adjusted breast mass was maximized at a chilled carcass wt of approximately 3.50 kg for population A (0.64 kg) and 3.05 kg for population B (0.89 kg). These findings indicate that increased biological output does not necessarily correspond to increased value-adjusted output when product quality is considered. Integrating biological performance and product quality within an economic framework provides a more comprehensive evaluation of broiler production and supports value-based decision-making.

Indexed as

Breast yieldBroilerEconomic valueExpected value modelingWoody breast

Identifiers

PMID42868847
PMCPMC13685962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.