ArticlePoultry science2026
Evaluating broiler performance through yield, product quality, and economic value.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Broiler production has been optimized for maximum biological output, particularly breast meat yield; however, the economic implications of increased yield in the presence of quality defects are often not integrated into comprehensive evaluations of performance. The objective of this study was to integrate processing yield, myopathy incidence, and economic weighting into an expected value (EV) framework to evaluate broiler performance based on retained value rather than total output. A total of 768 broilers from two populations were evaluated across two production cycles. Carcass yield, parts yields, and the incidence of breast myopathies were assessed, and relationships among variables were explored using correlation and regression analyses. Expected value modeling was applied by combining predicted breast yield with woody breast (WB) severity distributions and value-based weighting factors. Population A had greater breast yield than population B (30.9 vs. 29.9 %; p = 0.001) and a stronger relationship between breast wt and carcass wt (R² = 0.97 vs. 0.28), but also greater incidence of moderate and severe WB. Consequently, value-adjusted breast mass was maximized at a chilled carcass wt of approximately 3.50 kg for population A (0.64 kg) and 3.05 kg for population B (0.89 kg). These findings indicate that increased biological output does not necessarily correspond to increased value-adjusted output when product quality is considered. Integrating biological performance and product quality within an economic framework provides a more comprehensive evaluation of broiler production and supports value-based decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.