ReviewTranslational oncology2026
Patient-derived gastric cancer organoids for functional precision oncology: disease-specific bottlenecks and clinical readiness.
Review in Translational oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) poses a distinct modeling challenge. The disease varies by region, histology, metastatic site, and treatment history. It also develops within a gastric niche shaped by acid, mucus, polarity, microbes, and stroma. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) can preserve tumor-linked epithelial states and support living biobanks. They also enable genotype-phenotype studies and functional testing of therapeutic vulnerabilities. Their clinical value depends on representation, not model complexity alone. The assay must also return clear results within a useful clinical window. This review evaluates GC PDOs as functional companion models for precision oncology rather than stand-alone treatment decision tools. We discuss four barriers that limit clinical readiness. Establishment bias reduces representation of diffuse-type, scirrhous, and signet-ring cell carcinomas. Standard organoid lumens do not reproduce gastric acidity, stratified mucus, or Helicobacter pylori-driven polarity loss. Long-term expansion can select culture-adapted clones and weaken clinical representativeness. PDO drug screening also remains difficult to align with urgent treatment timelines. Fresh-sample assays may shorten turnaround time but reduce scale and depth. We further highlight biological insights gained from GC organoids. These include niche independence, epigenetic dependencies, ARID1A-linked vulnerabilities, and chemotherapy resistance. We propose a readiness framework based on six criteria: tumor authenticity, subtype coverage, niche fidelity, turnaround time, assay standards, and outcome validation. This framework may help define where GC PDOs can support clinical reasoning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.