Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42868242›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Cochlear Implant Referrals in Adults With Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss in the United Kingdom (CIRCA-2): Protocol for a Repeat National Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.

Alexander Scott North, Chloe Swords, Petrina Checkland, Jessica Daniels, Oliver George Denton, Amir Habeeb, Kim Hui Lim, Isaac Jarratt-Barnham, Amar Rajgor, Bhavesh Vijay Tailor and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alexander Scott North *Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1925-6586
Chloe Swords *Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0431-4491
Petrina ChecklandUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5241-4876
Jessica DanielsManchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9686-592X
Oliver George DentonQueen Elizabeth Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1314-8904
Amir HabeebBarking, Havering And Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9160-5800
Kim Hui LimRoyal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0872-0577
Isaac Jarratt-BarnhamSt George's Hospital, London, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3875-0881
Amar RajgorPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newvastle, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9323-3107
Bhavesh Vijay TailorJohn Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7534-5183
Jeremy WongUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2134-3814
Jameel MuzaffarUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3065-0269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) is a highly effective intervention for adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss, yet uptake across the United Kingdom remains low despite clear National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE 2019) guidance and well-established clinical benefits. The original Cochlear Implant Referral Criteria Audit (CIRCA-1) identified marked inequities in access to CIs in 2022, with lower referral rates among older adults, males, and individuals from socioeconomically deprived areas, alongside individuals from minority ethnic backgrounds being less likely to be informed of their eligibility for referral. Since then, national awareness initiatives and the expansion of the existing local "CI Champions" scheme have aimed to address these inequities, improve awareness of CI candidacy, and improve the quality of discussions with patients about options for CI referral. This repeat assessment aims to assess the success of these interventions to identify improvements in access to CIs as well as persisting barriers. Objective: CIRCA-2 is a national, multicenter, retrospective observational audit designed to re-evaluate adult CI referral pathways and measure progress since the first audit cycle. Methods: The study will include adults assessed in secondary-care ear, nose, throat, and audiology departments between July and December 2025 whose audiometric thresholds meet NICE TA566 criteria. Participating centers will identify eligible patients using the British Cochlear Implant Group Crystal Report within Auditbase, and anonymized demographic, audiometric, and service-level data will be extracted. The primary outcomes are the proportions of patients meeting NICE TA566 criteria who were informed of their eligibility and referred for CI assessment, with comparisons made to CIRCA-1 data. Secondary analyses will examine adherence to national standards and predictors of discussion and referral using multivariable modeling. In addition, the study will assess the number of patients within criteria for the Comparing Cochlear Implants With Hearing Aids in Adults (COACH) trial and those meeting CI criteria in one ear only. Results: Retrospective data for the period July 1 to December 31, 2025, were collected between January and March 2026. Eighty-three sites submitted data relating to 15,060 patients. Data analysis is projected to be complete by October 2026, with publication of final results expected in early 2027. Conclusions: By quantifying change over time, CIRCA-2 will provide an updated national picture of CI referral practice, highlight any persisting barriers, and inform future strategies to promote equitable access to CIs.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsHearing LossReferral and ConsultationAdultHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicRetrospective StudiesUnited Kingdomcochlear implantshealth inequalitiesnational auditobservational studyreferral pathwaysUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID42868242
PMCPMC13660863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.